Discussion Group Presentation- Mobile TV

Consumer adoption of mobile TV: Examining psychological flow and media content

In this research report, the authors tried to investigate the survival of the television-like, mobile TV. Based on the theoretical assumptions of the technology acceptance model (TAM), the researchers examined the influences of cognitive concentration (or flow experience) and media content on consumersacceptance of mobile TV. Mobile TV is thought of the next killer application to boost the mobile industry and, according to the marketing survey, wireless consumers are also highly looking forward to this fantastic content service.

In this paper, the researchers introduced two standards for mobile TV service which are the digital video broadcasting-Handheld (DVB-H), and the digital multimedia broadcasting (DMB). DVB-H has been tested mainly in European countries and the leading mobile phone manufacturer Nokia is ready to support this standard. In 2007, Nokia unveiled the first DVB-H mobile TV handset in Taiwan. On the other hand, some American wireless providers in support of this standard have started to cooperate with TV program companies to get the most popular content online. For the DMB, it is an advanced version of digital audio broadcasting that was initiated in the Unite States and European countries in 1990s.  However, DMB was popularly adopted in Japan especially for in-automobile terminals in 2004 and, in 2006, Korea also adopted this technology to provide wireless TV services to both in-automobile terminals and mobile TV consumers.

In North America, it is estimated that by the year 2011 more than 27 million wireless subscribers will spend an estimated $2.3 billion to access mobile TV. Moreover, it is expected that $841 million will be spent in advertising agency costs in support of mobile TV (Hyers, 2006). The data shows the prospects of wireless industry are brightening.

However, before the true advent of mobile TV era, the researchers indicated that there are still some problems to keep mobile TV service from success. These obstacles in technological aspect include the short battery life and the small screen size of handsets and the defective quality of service such as asynchronous mismatch between video and audio stream. They also pointed out that the current content of mobile TV is not good enough to attract consumers. In addition, the researchers indicate that Mobile TV users generally use the service in an unstable situation. Users typically use mobile TV during their commute or in short spare moments on the road or in the line waiting for a table or tickets. In this paper, the author also presented a scene that is happening often on the transportation. Imagine an individual using mobile TV in a crowded space like in subway or in a bus. In these situations the individual may have to constantly check for his/her arrival at the destination. In this case, the author called that distracted situations combined with technological drawback (e.g., flawed scenes, difficulty to use a device) and boring content result in significant degradation in users concentration on mobile TV.

The theory of the technology acceptance model (TAM) describes that an individual’s behavioral intention to accept a technology depends on two beliefs: perceived usefulness (PU), defined as the extent to which a person believes that using the technology will enhance his or her job performance, and perceived ease of use (PEOU), defined as the extent which a person believes that using the technology will be free of effort (Davis, 1989). Of course, the new technology should be easier to use. The simple operation of using mobile TV is a must and has better to parallel with that of watching home TV. Therefore, the design of a user-friendly interface on this small device would be a challenge.

Actually, mobile TV can be used to offer information on instant news report, weather or transportation, but the current use of mobile TV is mainly entertainment-oriented. Wireless providers should deal with the content more carefully to meet the needs of consumers. As the author mentioned that PU has a direct influence on users’ acceptance intention, because users will be more willing to adopt a technology if they can gain far more utility rather than suffer from it. On the other hand, PEOU affects both acceptance intention and perceived usefulness. The easier it is for an individual to interact with a technology, the more likely the individual will find it useful and intend to use it.

In conclusion, content is the most crucial factor to the future of mobile TV. The researchers emphasized that the content may be considered the root incentive for consumersacceptance of mobile TV. A positive assessment of content greatly enhances users’ cognitive concentration and perceived usefulness, which are two main elements driving behavioral intention. I think offering satisfactory content is the first key to mobile TV, because early adopters of this service would have large tolerance to the flawed technology. As engineers constantly improve this technology and the mobile TV service reaches a critical mass of population, it is the true era that mobile TV comes into fruition.

Questions:

What kinds of content would you like to watch on the mobile phone and what kinds of programs will appeal you?

Which country or culture is more likely to accept mobile TV and why?

What benefits do you want to gain from mobile TV?

Reference:

Davis, 1989 F.D. Davis, Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology, MIS Quarterly 13 (1989), pp. 319340. Full Text via CrossRef

Hyers, 2006 Hyers, K. (2006). US mobile broadcast video market: Five predictions. ABI Research.

Yung, Y. et al. (2009). Consumer adoption of mobile TV: Examining psychological flow and medianext term content. Computers in Human Behavior 25(1).

http://mobiletv.nokia.com/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ox0gdeygCTs



10個回應 »

  1. [...] YuHsuan [...]

  2. rebekahp said

    Great presentation. I really enjoyed the clip. It made it easier to understand exactly what mobile tv would look like! Nice job and good questions.

  3. sunagurol said

    Great presentation! I like how you cut out some of the parts of the theory and really got into the guts of the article. Also, I really appreciated the movie clip, to help Americans understand what a trainful of people watching tv on their phones would look like since we don’t do it here. You did a nice job incorporating imagery into your powerpoint as well. Nicely done!

  4. Pei-chieh said

    I like your slides and video clips. The slides show the ideas clearly, especially the comparison between countries. The video clip is interesting.
    Thanks for your sharing.

  5. Rubi said

    I don’t think that there is a potential for this in the US, mainly because of the lack of commuting. They love their space, in this case their car is their space, they prefer to sit in traffic in their own space that in a bus. However, as more people start discovering the benefits of commuting they will use it more. May be one benefit is going to be to watch the morning news in their way to work or their favorite show.

    I still have my doubts about it. I hope that one day technology goes mobile here in the US, but I just don’t see how???

  6. Nole said

    I really liked your questions that you asked us, and you did a good job explaining a piece of technology that I had never seen personally yet.

  7. cwu1204 said

    Your presentation was quite good. The questions you asked were interesting. All in all, I like your presentation.

  8. jenhuss said

    I presented this week as well, and it is interesting to see how all the presenters interpreted this article differently. From the above comments it looks like you did a great job and really tried to get the class to understand the cultural differences that are acting as deterrents from mobile TV being adopted.

  9. xiaoqiye said

    Good writting, Yuhsuan. You summarize the article in your own words very clear and flows like water. Good job! I wish i was in your presentation. From comments, looks like your presenation helps people be able to picture the Mobile TV experience. My presentation is from different angle. I aim to introduce audience something classic and useful life time. So i emphasis the TAM instead of the research topic Mobile TV itself. It is interesting to see different people approach differentlly. Good job!!

  10. verasays said

    Hi Yuhsuan,

    Although I did not have the chance to listen to your presentation, I was impressed with your writing and your clips. The clip gave us a vivid image of mobile TV. Moreover, your questions offered me to rethink what factors will influence the application of Mobile TV and what the trend will it be in the future. Nice Work!

RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI

Leave a Comment

你必須 logged in 發表一個回應